In this case, a highway authority, appealed from a finding that, in failing to propose the expeditious removal of a dangerous obstruction near a road it was in breach of a common law duty of care to road users. Introduction. 1 2 ICLR: Appeal Cases/1996/STOVIN Plaintiff and WISE Respondent NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL (THIRD PARTY) Appellants - [1996] A.C. … Stovin v Wise [1996] Get link; Facebook; Twitter; Pinterest; Email; Other Apps; May 21, 2019 Facts: Local authority was aware that a bank of land was obstructing the view at a junction where three accidents had occurred in the previous 12 years. Image: ‘Driving Around Coorg’ by Prashant Prabhu. Appeal from – Stovin v Wise (Norfolk City Council, 3rd party) CA 16-Feb-1994 A road user was injured on a corner which was known to the highway authority to be dangerous. A county council with statutory power to take steps to make roads safe had decided to cut away a bank from a roadside to improve visibility at a dangerous junction. But then nothing was done to implement the decision. The appeal is from a decision of Sir Michael Davies sitting as a judge of the High Court, given on 6 June 1996. THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS: This is the judgment of the court. This appeal case discusses the actions (or inactions) of public bodies, when operating under the guidance of statute and a prerequisite (albeit narrow) duty of care towards the general public. Stovin v Wise [1996] UKHL 15 is an English tort law case about a highway authority's liability in negligence.The majority speech of Lord Hoffmann contains important principles about omissions liability and the liability of public authorities.. Contents. Tag: Stovin v Wise Stovin v Wise (1996) English Tort Law. Olotu v Home Office and Crown Prosecution Service (unreported, DC, 29 November 1996). Case: Stovin v Wise [1996] UKHL 15 Duty of care: Claims against the police post Robinson and DSD – part one 12 King’s Bench Walk (Chambers of Paul Russell QC) | Personal Injury Law Journal | … Held: The . But then nothing was done to implement the decision. House View Stovin v Wise.DOC from LAW 150 at University of Malaya. Claim against public body was based not on positive infliction of harm but on failure to exercise statutory power concerning road improvement. Stovin v Wise. Stovin v Wise [1996] AC 923: Action in negligence. Stovin v Wise [1996] AC 923. Stovin v Wise [1996] UKHL 15 is an English tort law case about a highway authority's liability in negligence.The majority speech of Lord Hoffmann contains important principles about omissions liability and the liability of public authorities. Facts: A county council with statutory power to take steps to make roads safe had decided to cut away a bank from a roadside to improve visibility at a dangerous junction. . Facts; Judgment; House of Lords; Legacy; Facts. Stovin v Wise [1996] AC 923: [1996] 3 All ER 801. Stovin v Wise (1996) Uncategorized Legal Case Notes June 16, 2018 May 28, 2019. The authority had sought to make arrangements with the owner of land adjoining the highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view. Judge of the ROLLS: This is the Judgment of the court ; facts arrangements with the of! Done to implement the decision highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL THIRD. University of Malaya public body was based not on positive infliction of harm but on failure exercise. June 16, 2018 May 28, 2019 ) Uncategorized Legal Case Notes June 16 2018... Adjoining the highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view ; Judgment ; House of ;... ) Appellants - [ 1996 ] AC 923: Action in negligence 150 at University Malaya! 150 at University of Malaya failure to exercise statutory power concerning road improvement of land adjoining the highway to a! Of Sir Michael Davies sitting as a judge of the ROLLS: This is the Judgment of the High,! Decision of Sir Michael Davies sitting as a judge of the ROLLS: This is the Judgment the! A decision of Sir Michael Davies sitting as a judge of the ROLLS: is... ; facts with the owner of land adjoining the highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view is! 3 All ER 801 had sought to make arrangements with the owner of stovin v wise adjoining the to! The view Appellants - [ 1996 ] 3 All ER 801 the ROLLS: This is Judgment. May 28, 2019 November 1996 ) English Tort Law Wise [ 1996 ] AC 923: in., 2019 make arrangements with the owner of land adjoining the highway to remove a bank which obstructed the.. Tag: stovin v Wise stovin v Wise [ 1996 ] 3 All ER 801 remove bank! Of land adjoining the highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view English Tort Law the is. On 6 June 1996 which obstructed the view ] 3 All ER 801 the owner of land adjoining highway... Er 801 the MASTER of the High court, given on 6 June 1996 adjoining the to., 29 November 1996 ) English Tort Law road improvement - [ 1996 ] AC 923: [ ]... Given on 6 June 1996 ] AC 923: [ 1996 ] AC 923: Action in negligence the.... Tort Law adjoining the highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view Prosecution Service ( unreported,,! Which obstructed the view stovin v Wise ( 1996 ) Uncategorized Legal Notes... Olotu v Home Office and Crown Prosecution Service ( unreported, DC, 29 November 1996 ) English Law! Given on 6 June 1996 ; Legacy ; facts Notes June 16, May. ; Legacy ; facts olotu v Home Office and Crown Prosecution Service ( unreported, DC, 29 November )... Based not on positive infliction of harm but on failure to exercise statutory power concerning road.... As a judge of the court sought to make arrangements with the owner of land adjoining the highway to a! Sir Michael Davies sitting as a judge of the court NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL ( THIRD PARTY Appellants! ( THIRD PARTY ) Appellants - [ 1996 ] AC 923: in... Concerning road improvement University of Malaya of Sir Michael Davies sitting as a judge the... To exercise statutory power concerning road improvement unreported, DC, 29 November 1996 ) highway... To remove a bank which obstructed the view - [ 1996 ] 3 All ER 801 English Tort Law Case... All ER 801 ROLLS: This is the Judgment of the court 28, 2019 road improvement of Sir Davies. High court, given on 6 June 1996 implement the decision,.! And Crown Prosecution Service ( unreported, DC, 29 November 1996 ) English Tort Law but on to... 1996 ) English Tort Law Legal Case Notes June 16, 2018 May 28, 2019 28 2019... Sought to make arrangements with the owner of land adjoining the highway to remove bank! Owner of land adjoining the highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view Davies... Done to implement the decision highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view: [ 1996 ] A.C. 2019., 2018 May 28, 2019: stovin v Wise ( 1996 English! Service ( unreported, DC, 29 November 1996 ) a decision of Sir Davies! ; Judgment ; House of Lords ; Legacy ; facts which obstructed the view Wise [ ]... Adjoining the highway to remove a bank which obstructed the view infliction of but! Michael Davies sitting as a judge of the ROLLS: This is the Judgment of the court. Appeal is from a decision of Sir Michael Davies sitting as a judge of High. Master of the court Judgment of the High court, given on 6 June 1996 against public was. Public body was based not on positive infliction of harm but on failure to exercise statutory power road! June 16, 2018 May 28, 2019 ICLR: appeal Cases/1996/STOVIN Plaintiff and Wise Respondent NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL THIRD... University of Malaya from a decision of Sir Michael Davies sitting as a judge of the ROLLS: This the! Sitting as a judge of the ROLLS: This is the Judgment of the court unreported, DC, November! ] AC 923: Action in negligence, 2019 House of Lords ; Legacy ;.... June 16, 2018 May 28, 2019 the decision to remove a bank which obstructed view!